Trump meets 11 GOP members in Oval Office to revive crypto

• Trump meets 11 GOP members in Oval Office to restart crypto week
• Bloc of Republicans and all Democrats block procedural vote over packaging
• Bills cover stablecoin rules, market structure changes, and CBDC ban

The House’s ambitious “crypto week” came to a sudden halt when a trio of cryptocurrency bills failed to reach the floor for debate. What began as an effort to fast‑track a Senate‑passed stablecoin regulatory framework alongside broader market‑structure reforms quickly unraveled when an unlikely coalition of 13 Republicans joined Democrats to block the procedural vote. This setback not only paused legislation that had taken the Senate nearly six weeks to advance, but also challenged President Trump vigorous push to cement the United States as the “crypto capital of the world.”

Trump Late Push on Crypto Bills

Late Tuesday evening, President Trump convened a meeting in the Oval Office with key Republican lawmakers—claiming to secure the support of 11 of the 12 needed for passage. He took to social media to declare that votes would occur “as soon as possible,” signaling a renewed effort to bring the bills back on track. Yet despite his intervention, House leadership canceled votes for the remainder of the day, underscoring the fragility of the majority’s unity. Just hours earlier, Speaker Mike Johnson had warned reporters that procedural hurdles were part of the “legislative process,” but the abrupt cancellation reflected a deeper divide over how to package the three bills for final approval.

Republican‑Democrat Alliance and Legislative Deadlock

The unexpected bloc of 13 Republicans, aligned with all House Democrats, rejected the motion to proceed—among them long‑standing critics of sweeping financial legislation. Many argued that the bills should be merged into a single package, a requirement that would necessitate returning the measures to the Senate where only one of the three had been approved. As a result, negotiators from both chambers and the White House scrambled to find common ground. Rep. Glenn Thompson of Pennsylvania, a co‑sponsor, noted that certain members doubted the Senate’s willingness to advance the remaining bills unless they moved as one “omnibus” package. This insistence fueled a standoff that left stablecoin oversight—and the fate of a Federal Reserve digital currency ban—in limbo.

Stablecoin Regulation and Market Structure Measures

At the heart of these debates lies the Senate‑passed stablecoin bill, which took six weeks to clear the upper chamber. Its provisions aim to regulate an emerging class of tokens pegged to fiat currencies, establishing consumer protections and custody requirements. Parallel to this, two more expansive bills propose to overhaul market infrastructure and to prohibit the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency. Republican leaders, including Trump, pressed the House to pass the stablecoin legislation individually, hoping to secure the president’s signature before an August recess. However, packaging disputes threatened to stall all three, exposing tensions over legislative strategy and timeline.

Trump Family Interests and Policy Gaps

Beyond the policy details, critics have raised concerns about President Trump’s personal stake in the outcome. Trump and his family reportedly hold significant shares in World Liberty Financial, which recently launched its own USD1 stablecoin. Although the Senate bill bars members of Congress from profiting, it notably exempts the president and his family—an omission that industry observers have labeled a glaring loophole. This discrepancy fueled questions about whether political self‑interest influenced the push for expedited passage. As Faryar Shirzad, Coinbase’s chief policy officer, remarked, progress on pro‑crypto legislation often faces unexpected setbacks, and moments like Tuesday will reveal “who is trying to get pro‑crypto legislation done and who is not.”

Implications for the 2026 Midterms and Industry Trust

The stalled votes carry broader political repercussions. Fairshake, a crypto‑focused super PAC, has already amassed over $140 million in war chest funds ahead of the 2026 midterms, signaling a coordinated effort to support pro‑crypto candidates. Its spokesperson, Josh Vlasto, emphasized that voters “need responsible regulation” rather than partisan gridlock. With consumer trust in digital assets hinging on clear legal frameworks, each legislative delay risks eroding confidence and slowing innovation. As the House, Senate, and White House negotiate next steps, stakeholders across finance and politics will be watching closely to see whether yesterday’s deadlock becomes tomorrow’s blueprint for compromise.

Conclusion

The derailment of crypto week highlights the complex interplay between legislative process, party dynamics, and personal interests. While President Trump’s late‑night push underscored the administration’s commitment, the alliance of dissenting Republicans and Democrats revealed deeper strategic divides. As negotiators work to reconcile packaging demands and timing pressures, the ultimate fate of stablecoin oversight and broader market reforms remains uncertain—but the stakes for trust in the U.S. crypto ecosystem have never been higher.

Disclaimer

The information provided in this article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. The article does not offer sufficient information to make investment decisions, nor does it constitute an offer, recommendation, or solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument. The content is opinion of the author and does not reflect any view or suggestion or any kind of advise from CryptoNewsBytes.com. The author declares he does not hold any of the above mentioned tokens or received any incentive from any company.

Featured image created by AI