- Shares down 15% this month; mNAV near 1.57 from 3.4.
- Preferred raised $47M; 900,000 new shares sold on Aug 25.
- ETFs and peers weigh on the premium; cohort holds $108B BTC.
Michael Saylor Strategy Inc., formerly MicroStrategy, is under pressure as shares fall 15% this month and mNAV slips to about 1.57 from 3.4. A $47 million preferred raise fell short, leading to common-share issuance despite July guidance against sales below 2.5x; on Aug. 25 about 900,000 shares were sold. With treasuries holding $108 billion (4.7% of supply), the stakes extend beyond one firm.
Michael Saylor and the stock-to-Bitcoin linkage
Michael Saylor repositioned a modest enterprise software firm into a balance-sheet proxy for Bitcoin starting in 2020. The stock stopped trading on earnings potential and instead tracked a multiple of on-balance-sheet Bitcoin. That approach turned the company into a visible benchmark for a new kind of treasury policy. The compression from 3.4x mNAV to about 1.57 during an up-cycle, not a winter, marks a structural shift. It shows the premium once granted to balance-sheet Bitcoin exposure is no longer automatic.
Market backlash and the shrinking premium
The 15% monthly decline erased a sizable slice of the premium that had been sustained by frequent capital raises and Bitcoin purchases. Investors now compare every dollar raised against dilution, leverage, and the actual Bitcoin added. When the preferred program delivered only $47 million, the fallback to common issuance lowered confidence. A lower mNAV reduces the capacity to buy more Bitcoin without added dilution, creating a loop that can pressure the share price and the premium at the same time.
Financing pivot: preferred stock, common issuance, and dilution
The stated plan was to move away from convertible notes over four years and rely more on preferred stock whose principal does not come due. That structure reduces maturity risk, but it requires consistent market demand. When demand proved tepid, Strategy used common issuance to bridge the gap. Issuing equity when the mNAV is near 1.57, after pledging to avoid sales below 2.5x with narrow exceptions, unsettled holders who had priced in a stricter approach.
Michael Saylor guidance, 2.5x mNAV, and the Aug. 25 sale
Michael Saylor set an expectation in late July that shares would not be issued below a 2.5x mNAV, aside from limited carve-outs. Within two weeks the guidance changed, and on Aug. 25 about 900,000 shares were sold. For parts of the market, this looked like a breach of trust. The timing mattered: the multiple was already declining. Selling into a falling mNAV can produce a negative flywheel in which the stock weakens, balance-sheet buying power drops, and the premium compresses further.
A cohort that holds 4.7% of Bitcoin supply
The strategy inspired a wave of treasury firms. According to BitcoinTreasuries.net, public companies and similar vehicles now hold more than $108 billion, or roughly 4.7% of circulating supply. This concentration magnifies mark-to-market swings during stress and amplifies enthusiasm during up-moves. Capriole Investments estimates that nearly one-third of public companies with Bitcoin trade below the value of their reserves, a sign that markets are discounting governance, liquidity, or the quality of underlying businesses.
Michael Saylor playbook versus spot Bitcoin ETFs
Michael Saylor helped validate the idea of using a corporate balance sheet as a permanent Bitcoin demand engine. The rise of spot ETFs changed the comparison set. Investors can hold fund shares without taking on corporate leverage, governance risk, or dilution. During the post-election rally, both ETFs and Strategy gained, but the spread narrowed as investors weighed the simplicity of fund exposure. Campbell Harvey notes that flows are momentum-sensitive; when prices stall or fall, enthusiasm fades faster for vehicles that layer on equity issuance risk.
Copycats, liquidity limits, and maturity risk
The past year brought influencers and politically connected figures into the space through SPACs and reverse mergers. Many new issuers lack the depth of trading or the credit profile to copy Strategy’s capital structure. Smaller firms depend on convertible notes, adding interest costs and maturity risk that become difficult during drawdowns. Jack Mallers observed that registering a company to buy Bitcoin is not scarce on its own; scale, liquidity, and discipline separate durable models from short-lived ones.
Michael Saylor in a crowded field of treasury vehicles
Michael Saylor remains the most visible face of the model, yet the field is more crowded than at any point since 2020. Competition for the same exposure has increased through ETFs and alternative corporate structures. Jake Ostrovskis points out that a declining premium is a natural reaction to competition and the emergence of other access routes to digital assets. In a market with many channels, premiums tend to converge toward the most efficient option.
Governance signals and investor trust
Issuance discipline is a governance signal. The promise not to sell shares below 2.5x mNAV set a clear line. Softening that line and selling nearly 900,000 shares on Aug. 25 reduced confidence at a sensitive moment. Online, Michael Saylor dismissed criticism with an image of himself walking past a large bear, but the underlying issue was mechanical: selling equity while the mNAV compresses can accelerate the compression. Rebuilding trust requires consistency between stated thresholds and actual financing moves.
Mechanics of the negative flywheel
When the stock trades at about 1.57x mNAV, each new share sold buys fewer satoshis per existing holder than at 3.4x. If the market reads the sale as a signal that more issuance may follow, the multiple can slip again. The next raise then buys even less, and the spiral intensifies. This feedback loop is not unique to one company; any treasury that issues into a falling multiple risks the same cycle. The best defense is to raise when the multiple is strong or to use instruments that avoid direct equity dilution.
Michael Saylor supporters’ case: flexibility and index inclusion
Supporters argue that flexibility is valuable if the company nears S&P 500 inclusion or if a new up-leg in Bitcoin unfolds. Being able to add coins at scale could help restore the multiple if price momentum returns and passive flows increase. That case depends on near-term discipline, because index committees and large allocators scrutinize governance and financing signals. A consistent path toward retiring convertible notes and relying on preferred stock would reduce maturity risk in the meantime.
Stress testing the model at minus fifty percent
Charles Edwards raises a direct scenario: if Bitcoin falls 50%, enthusiasm for treasury companies wanes, mNAVs compress, and boards reconsider their policies. The 2022 Terra-Luna episode showed how quickly the multiple can collapse. The difference today is the size of the cohort and the presence of ETFs that give the market a clean alternative. A deep drawdown would test which treasuries have operating businesses that can carry the balance sheet without frequent issuance.
Ether and Solana as rotating targets for balance-sheet exposure
Some capital has rotated toward other networks viewed as closer to decentralized finance. Ether-focused treasuries have committed more than $19 billion. Solana has also drawn interest. These rotations do not remove the core question investors ask of balance-sheet strategies: is there a durable operating business that underwrites volatility, or is the model dependent on continuous equity or debt issuance to add coins during rallies?
Michael Saylor, competition, and the road back to a durable premium
Michael Saylor built a proof of concept that a corporate balance sheet could act as a steady source of Bitcoin demand. The compression from 3.4x to about 1.57x during a broadly positive market says the premium is now earned, not granted. Clear thresholds for issuance, timely use of preferred securities, and consistent progress on retiring convertibles would help stabilize the multiple. In a market where ETFs are cheap and liquid, any residual premium must be justified by execution rather than narrative.
Conclusion
The month’s 15% share decline, the $47 million preferred raise, and the Aug. 25 sale of nearly 900,000 shares show how sensitive the mNAV premium is to financing choices. Michael Saylor proved that a balance-sheet strategy can scale, but the wider adoption of ETFs and the growth of alternative vehicles raised the bar for maintaining a premium. With corporate treasuries holding more than $108 billion, or 4.7% of supply, issuance discipline and governance signals now carry more weight than at any point since 2020.
Disclaimer
The information provided in this article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. The article does not offer sufficient information to make investment decisions, nor does it constitute an offer, recommendation, or solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument. The content is opinion of the author and does not reflect any view or suggestion or any kind of advise from CryptoNewsBytes.com. The author declares he does not hold any of the above mentioned tokens or received any incentive from any company.
Featured image created by AI
